First of all, it is not an act of disloyalty or disobedience to question the wisdom of the document in the first place, particularly when this permission is a revolution against all the pre-Vatican II rubrics that existed for centuries rubrics that existed for reasons of reverence, to safeguard against desecration and that were a matter of Catholic common sense. Nation May 19, 2020 12:41 PM EDT. But now, lay people administering the Blessed Sacrament is an ordinary sight in the average Novus Ordo parish church, and most Catholics think nothing of it proving that men can become desensitized to desecration. St. Cyril of Jerusalem in 348 gave this instruction to his congregation:When you approach Holy Communion, make the left hand into a throne for the right, which will receive the King. It also shows both side of the issue at hand. 2023 After the Warning . In the pre-Vatican II Church, when the Latin Tridentine Mass was the norm, men training to be priests were not only taught, but drilled in these rubrics. he took a cup, and after giving thanks, he gave it to them and said, Worship Service April 30, 2023- Praise and Worship Service - Facebook If it were sacrileges, the present teaching do not reflect that to be the case. Moreover, communion separates us from sin. Earlier this week, Catholic commentator John-Henry Westen, co-founder and editor-in-chief of LifeSiteNews, detailed five reasons why Catholics should only receive Holy Communion on the tongue. who plants nor the one who waters is anything, but only God who gives And in order not to continually play into the manipulating hands of the New Paganism of Modernism, then a complete, formal, unambiguous condemnation of Communion in the hand and Extraordinary Ministers is our leaders only true Catholic option. (Acts 3:12 CSB), "When Peter entered, Cornelius met him, fell at his feet, and Catholics believe that the real presence of our Lord is in the bread and wine and therefore it is only appropriate to behave in a such manner of reverence that is due to Him. But the point is that the very document that permitted the seeking of an indult for Communion on the hand in very limited cases at the same time strongly advocated for Communion on the tongue, adding that it is a sign of the reverence of the faithful toward the Eucharist and is needed for the most fruitful reception of the Lords body (Memoriale Domini). Lay people started reading the Epistle, and the new responsorial psalms. In summary, the letters (which can be found in Michael Davies Privilege of the Ordained) stated that Rome has received many complaints of abuses regarding Extraordinary Ministers. Prayers of the Faithful, and even greeted us over the microphone before Mass wishing us good morning, telling us what hymns well be singing and what Eucharistic Prayer Father fancies today. The note was more of a thanks to Ken. LONDON, Ontario, December 8, 2020 ( LifeSiteNews) - An Ontario bishop warned priests in his diocese that they may face "prosecution" along with the closure of their churches unless they strictly. It is also worth noting that there was no leaving the Sacred Host upon the altar to walk up and down the aisles (especially before his fingers have been purified), shaking peoples hands in an awkward display of forced friendliness. Lay people giving out Holy Communion during Mass was rightly considered an unthinkable act of sacrilege and irreverence only 35 years ago, and for centuries preceding. Now, does this mean 5 minutes or 45 minutes unduly prolonged? Or do only ordained priests sin, and can only they, therefore, break the bread? This ruling too, has been completely ignored, as will be all rulings providing a concession for this abuse is somewhere on the books. Communion in the hand and Christian persecution From a Cloud The practice of receiving Holy Communion in the hand first began to spread in Catholic circles during the early 1960s, primarily in Holland. And in instructions of this nature, lack of precision gives rise to wide interpretation, and wide interpretation gives rise to the establishment of an abuse under the appearance of fidelity to Church regulations. In his best-selling book, The Last Roman Catholic?, James W. Demers said, Of those responsible for the lack of beauty in the Church, no one is more culpable than todays lay ministers. Priests were trained in the Old Latin Mass to celebrate Mass with precise rubrics that safeguarded the reverence the Blessed Sacrament deserves. With regard to receiving Communion in the hand, there is a significant development from the 1985 GIRM to the 2003/2011 edition. When these are prevented from administering Holy Communion because of another pastoral ministry or because of ill health or advanced age. But the New Paganism has for its very essence contempt for tradition and contempt for ancestry. Father Edward Schillebeeckx, an influential liberal theologian at Vatican II, admitted that placing deliberate ambiguity in the Council documents was a key strategy of the progressives. Communion in the hand to a trusting, vulnerable people was a campaign of calculated half-truths that didnt tell the whole story. We are people also, just like This document does not grant some revolutionary indult for any and every parish to permit lay-people to administer Communion; it authorizes the use of extraordinary ministers in cases of genuine necessity , which are listed as: When there is no priest, deacon or acolyte. The office of Eucharistic minister is therefore the illegitimate offspring from the union of the New Liturgys lay involvement and Communion in the hand living together in the modern Church. At the end of Mass, the priest scrapes the corporal with the paten, and cleans it into the chalice so that if the slightest Particle was left, It would be collected and reverently consumed. It is well balance and not one sided. rev2023.5.1.43405. They figured that if they ignored. After the Second Vatican Council, a very wise Archbishop shrewdly observed that the masterstroke of satan was to sow disobedience to Catholic tradition through obedience. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Church volunteers have delivered . They conducted the tedious Let us pray to the Lord Lord hear our prayer Prayers of the Faithful, and even greeted us over the microphone before Mass wishing us good morning, telling us what hymns well be singing and what Eucharistic Prayer Father fancies today. "The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a sharing in the blood Folder's list view has different sized fonts in different folders, the Allied commanders were appalled to learn that 300 glider troops had drowned at sea. 400 years ago, Communion in the hand was introduced into Christian worship by men whose motives were rooted in defiance of Catholicism. "Why do you stare at us, as though we had made him walk by our own March 1995 Issue), suffice it to say that this novel ecumenical spirit which Deitrich von Hildebrand called ECUMANIA became rampant during and after Vatican II. If we had a video livestream of a clock being sent to Mars, what would we see? Paul relates the communion to the sacrifice of Christ and then says to examine one's self in verse 28. Gather with others in your household and begin a time of prayer with the Sign of the Cross. First, because he consecrates in the person of Christ. Communion on the tongue certainly dates back to the earliest centuries of Church history, and possibly back to the time of the Apostles. Your gift is tax-deductible as allowed by law. Todays Eucharistic Ministers actually operate in defiance of existing Vatican norms. During this time of COVID and the restrictions that come with it, some bishops and parishes are requiring Catholics to accept Communion on the hand, rather than on the tongue. We're not salespeople, but we depend on donations averaging $14.76 and fewer than 1% of readers give. After Vatican II, some ecumenically-minded priests in Holland started giving Communion in the hand, in a monkey-see, monkey-do imitation of Protestant practice. Its been disguised as a reward that the good and humble in the parish accept reluctantly, and then get used to. From the moment that the words of consecration over the Sacred Host are uttered by the priest, he keeps his forefinger and thumb together, and whether he elevates the chalice, turns the pages of the Missal or opens the tabernacle, his thumb and forefinger touch nothing but the Sacred Host. , if the priests opposition to Communion in the hand should be fierce and firm, their opposition to Extraordinary Ministers should be even more adamant. Statement - The antichrist has no soul and Warning about the Book of This is provoking questions among the faithful. In the new mass, this has been changed, Catholics no longer kneel down and take communion in tongue. Perhaps it is worthwhile to reconsider how we receive the Eucharist, for not as common bread and common drink do we receive these (St. Justin Martyr, AD 150). Click herefor a handout that can be placed in your bulletin for your parishioner. This ruling too, has been completely ignored, We can only pray that our Church leaders will finally come to the realization that when it comes to the Blessed Sacrament, you dont. Not only should we rarely see one, but there should be many Catholics who go through their entire life without once seeing an extraordinary minister. He said, We have used ambiguous phrases during the Council and we (the liberal theologians) know how we shall interpret them after., The main ambiguity which probably gave rise to todays proliferation of Extraordinary Ministers was the justification of their use if Mass would be (what was called) unduly prolonged. For the first three centuries the Eucharist was celebrated in the houses and homes of Christians. If you donate just $5.00, the price of your coffee, Catholic Online School could keep thriving. So, since it is obvious that the Blessed Sacrament is the greatest treasure the Church possesses, then It must be treated with all the reverence and homage It deserves. This document does not grant some revolutionary indult for any and every parish to permit lay-people to administer Communion; it authorizes the use of extraordinary ministers in cases of genuine necessity , which are listed as: The Instruction stipulates that: Since these faculties are granted only for the spiritual good of the Faithful and for cases of genuine necessity, priests are to remember that they are not thereby excused from the task of distributing the Eucharist to the Faithful who legitimately request it, and especially from taking and giving it to the sick.. Our Catholic fathers at home, as well as our teaching Sisters in school, told us that it was sacrilegious for anyone but the priest to touch the Sacred Host. Next time I hear about this topic from one of those, whom I know, I'll have a better tid bit to offer them. Communion received on the tongue and while kneeling. According to Roman Catholic discipline, the Code of Canon Law does not object to the reception of Communion by Christians of these Churches (canon 844 3). It is a pattern we see over and over again in the modern Church: Lets violate the law, and in the end well have the violation established as local custom., This unlawful abuse is so well established as local custom that even Pope John Paul II, who made at least a paper attempt to curb the abuse, was completely unsuccessful. Guidelines for the Reception of Communion | USCCB Truth About Communion in the Hand While Standing So, if imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, it is not unfair to ask why are our modern churchmen imitating self-proclaimed infidels who reject core sacramental teaching of Catholicism? A Pastoral Guide to Receiving Communion - Crisis Magazine The Reception of Holy Communion at Mass | USCCB The question has been asked for a long time since the Church has often allowed both methods of reception. However, since 1969, the Holy See has granted permission to bishops' conferences who have requested it for holy Communion to be received on the hand. He explains: The dispensing of Christs Body belongs to the priest for three reasons. performance | 130 views, 3 likes, 2 loves, 36 comments, 1 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from Ginghamsburg Church: Worship is serious business. Or its a position that the proud and pompous in the parish lust after, thereby showing themselves incapable of recognizing a false and petty prestige. The Reception of Holy Communion in the United States the growth."" The Apostolic See therefore strongly urges bishops, priests and people to observe zealously this law.. Those who receive Communion may receive either in the hand or on the tongue, and the decision should be that of the individual . In the pre-Vatican II Church, when the Latin Tridentine Mass was the norm, men training to be priests were not only taught, but. How can one say it is a sacrilege to receive the Lord on our hands as children carried it in the Early Church. Communion in the Hand - AfterTheWarning.com Second, because the priest is the appointed intermediary between God and the people, hence as it belongs to him to offer the peoples gifts to God, so it belongs to him to deliver the consecrated gifts to the people. How much more cautiously then will you observe that not a crumb falls from you, of what is more precious than gold and precious stones. It had not yet started in the United States. Hence, it is not lawful for anyone else to touch it except from necessity (Summa Theologica). Priests, bishop reveal rashness in banning Communion on - LifeSite Here's how to make a 'Spiritual Communion' when unable to participate in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Copyright 2022 Catholic Online. This same school of thought also maintains that the quotation of Saint Cyril is of unsound Arian apocryphal origins. Jesus gave some rather interesting instructions to the disciples before sending them out in his name, but some of these make many Christians uncomfortable (or we just chose to ignore Jesus). Each and every priest in the Roman Rite had to follow them with unyielding precision. Communion received on the tongue and while kneeling. And though these practices have been introduced under the guise of being an authentic liturgical development mandated by Vatican II, the truth is Communion in the hand. Prudence and judgement are key in this discussion. "As they were eating, Jesus took bread, blessed and broke it, gave it Communion on the tongue safer than Communion in the hand: Polish How should we prepare to receive Christ in the Eucharist? In his 1931 essay on The New Paganism, the great Catholic historian Hilaire Belloc warned of the post-Christian Paganism that was to come. The little that is known about him comes from a metrical inscription by Pope Damasus I, who was pope in the second half of the 4th century. Now, when it comes to showing reverence, is it possible for these rubrics to be improved upon? The sense of the sacred is found wherever safeguarding the reverence for the Blessed Sacrament is put into practice of paramount importance. Our fathers told us these things not just for the sake of handing down a venerable but groundless tradition, they have told us these things through word and example to show fidelity to the Catholic Faith and reverence toward the Blessed Sacrament. I write this not to stir up controversy, but to provide a context against which individuals may decide how best to receive Jesus Precious Body and Blood, especially in our current culture. Because the sense of the sacred is not lost, we know exactly where it is, and it could be recovered in every single parish church on earth tomorrow. At other times Christians gathered together openly in each others homes or in house churches for the Eucharist though Mass was not celebrated publicly as it is in our own time. We cannot be certain precisely how Jesus distributed His Body to the Apostles, but it seems likely if He were to distribute the Sacrament exclusively on the tongue then a detail of such importance would be carefully recorded. A closer reading of the text will reveal they were but disciples at this point, as are we all. Where Communion on the hand prevails, bishops could request an indult to continue this practice, and Rome would consider it. Can or should a consecrated Host be adored by way of a live Eucharistic televised broadcast? Hence, it is not lawful for anyone else to touch It, except from necessity, for instance, if It were to fall upon the ground or else in some other case of urgency. (, Saint Thomas, who is the prince of theologians in the Catholic Church, who towers above all the rest, whose, was placed on the altar next to the Scriptures during the Council of Trent, and whose teaching Saint Pius X said was. And where they were, they were for keeps! One day, he was entrusted with the task of bringing the Eucharist to condemned Christians in prison. OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF. This is why the new liturgy so closely resembles a Protestant service. The Canadian bishops wrote a pastoral letter supposedly. Submit a Rosary Prayer Request to be Read Live Online. Federal Tax Identification Number: 81-0596847. Bishop Sheen once wrote that both men and women are slaves to fashion, but with this difference he said if women are slaves to fashions of clothing, men are slaves to fashions of thought. They must find the courage for opposing this novel practice by remembering that even Pope Paul VI, despite his weaknesses, correctly predicted that Communion in the hand would lead to irreverence and profanation of the Eucharist, and a gradual erosion of correct doctrine and we have seen this prophecy come to pass. Barnabas they called Zeus, and Paul, Hermes, because he was the chief How often have we heard even our Church leaders lament that we have lost the sense of the sacred. This is one of the most astounding statements a Churchman can utter as if it were some sort of mystery. But now, lay people administering the Blessed Sacrament is an ordinary sight in the average. Now we are at the point where Communion in the hand is viewed as a. way of receiving the Eucharist and the vast majority of our little children are being misinstructed to receive First Communion in the hand. Archbishop tells bishops they'll 'end up in hell' for - LifeSite If you have already donated, we sincerely thank you. But, for whatever reason, this 1980 document contained no threat of penalty to any layman, priest or bishop who ignored the Popes plea. Hi readers, it seems you use Catholic Online a lot; that's great! And it must be noted that at this time, the abuse was limited to a few European countries. the traditional practice of receiving Holy Communion only on the tongue. Not only was Communion in the hand started in disobedience, it was perpetuated by deceit. So, then, neither the one do not mention that permission was only to be a. where it had already been established by 1969. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) - Summa Theologica, Part III, Q. Did early Protestants consider transubstantiation to be idol worship? What do hollow blue circles with a dot mean on the World Map. Reception of Holy Communion in the Hand - Catholic Voice condemned with the world." It is found in the celebration of the Old Latin Tridentine Mass where profound reverence for the Blessed Sacrament is deeply ingrained into every moment of the Liturgy, and where Communion in the hand and Eucharistic Ministers are still looked upon in horror with Catholic eyes, and are clearly recognized as the out-of-place, sacrilegious, non-Catholic practices that they are. brought bulls and wreaths to the gates because he intended, with the Humanae Vitae rightly reaffirmed the Churchs teaching against contraception. In 2009, in the midst of the H1N1 influenza pandemic, a lay Catholic in England in a diocese where Holy Communion on the tongue was restricted due to the pandemic wrote the Vatican about the . A few countries had already illicitly allowed Communion in the hand. But today, theres nothing extraordinary about extraordinary ministers. When vast numbers of Catholics, then, rejected. Accordingly, as the consecration of Christs Body belongs to the priest, so likewise does the dispensing belong to him. In his letter Domincae Cenae of February 24, 1980, the Pope restated the Churchs teaching that to touch the sacred species and to administer them with their own hands is a privilege of the ordained. But, for whatever reason, this 1980 document contained no threat of penalty to any layman, priest or bishop who ignored the Popes plea. According to Catholicism, does Welchs Grape Juice constitute valid matter for the consecration of the Mass? On September 21, 1987, a letter was sent from the Cardinal Prefect of the Congregation of the Sacraments through the proper channels to a number of Episcopal Conferences, including the American Bishops, on the subject of Extraordinary Ministers. Because Church leaders allowed the abuse to go unchecked, the practice then spread to Germany, Belgium and France. Undoubtedly, there will be parishes and ministers who will distribute Communion on the tongue regardless. This is why the new liturgy so closely resembles a Protestant service. While it's understandable the Apostles were worthy recipients of the Eucharist, Jesus was also modeling the Sacrament for future practice. The short answer is no! True. This liturgical law clarifies the Church's discipline regarding the reception of Holy Communion. Each and every priest in the Roman Rite had to follow them with unyielding precision. BBC - Religions - Christianity: Eucharist Shortly after Vatican II, due to the escalating abuses in certain non-English speaking countries (Holland, Belgium, France and Germany), Pope Paul VI took a survey of the world's bishops to ascertain their opinions on the subject. I planted, , but within that document the bishops used the curious phrase norms for licit dissent. But I tell The sense of the sacred is found wherever safeguarding the. parish church, and most Catholics think nothing of it proving that men can become desensitized to desecration. Because in all the other sacraments we receive sacramental grace, but in the Holy Eucharist, we receive Christ Himself. 2023.04.30 8:30 Worship at Faith: Easter 4A - Facebook And it can be argued that the risk is quite minimal. It respects perhaps nothing, but least of all does it respect the spirit of Our fathers have told us.. @jaredad7 Would you consider posting a question about this. Basil the Great considered Communion in the hand so irregular that he did not hesitate to consider it a grave fault. As parish churches reopen and Communion becomes available, many bishops prefer, for the safety of parishioners and clergy alike, that the faithful accept Communion in the hand. Now, does this mean 5 minutes or 45 minutes unduly prolonged? If you donate just $5.00, the price of your coffee, Catholic Online School could keep thriving. Are there parishes that celebrates Novus Ordo mass in Latin? Communion in the hand was introduced under a false ecumenism, allowed to grow due to weakness in authority, approved through compromise and a false sense of toleration, and has led to profound irreverence and indifference toward the Blessed Sacrament as the commonplace liturgical abuse and the disgrace of our age. and received from the Holy See permission for Communion in the hand continues to lengthen year by year.1 The recent re-intro . Communion in the Hand? Pt II - The Now Word Similarly, the Synod of Rouen (AD 650) decreed: Do not put the Eucharist in the hands of any layman or laywoman only in their mouths., The Sixth Ecumenical Council at Constantinople (AD 680681) also forbade the taking of Communion in the hand by the laity, under threat of excommunication. Understandably, this is a significant deviation from long-cherished tradition for many Catholics. Communion in the Hand - JSTOR (Values is a subjective term you wont find in pre-Vatican II theology manuals). What happened to the Catholic Knights Hospitaller? This phrase gives the impression that there could be room for Catholics to legitimately reject Humanae Vitae. However some may believe otherwise. What is the proper way of receiving Communion in the hand? Christians don't say that . If it were a sacrilege, that indult would not have been accorded by Rome. But let a man prove himself . "Signpost" puzzle from Tatham's collection, Ubuntu won't accept my choice of password, Copy the n-largest files from a certain directory to the current one. And to add insult to injury, the introduction of Communion in the hand makes all these crucial pre-Vatican II rubrics look like superstitious sentimentalism with no foundation in reality again. What were the most popular text editors for MS-DOS in the 1980s? reverence for the Blessed Sacrament is put into practice of paramount importance. Communion on the tongue displays a greater degree of reverence, and it is safer because it is less likely to result in the host, or a particle of the host falling to the floor. In other words, the real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist is just a Papist superstition, and that the bread is just bread and anybody can handle it. But obliterating these without apology and without convincing argument, as has been the case over the last 30 years with the introduction of the New Mass, is not the mark of genuine Catholic renewal, but resembles the New Paganism warned of by Belloc, and its arrogant contempt for tradition. 5 reasons why Catholics should only receive Holy Communion on the The motivation for this practice is two-fold: a) first, to avoid the dropping of Eucharistic particles [today, consecrated Hosts are regularly stolen for use in satanic Masses and other blasphemous practices even sold on eBay! I find it quite enlightening. An illustration can be given by the story of the Canadian bishops response to Humanae Vitae. While communion on the hand is forbidden in the Extraordinary Form of the Mass and is given while kneeling only, unless prohibited due to physical illness. On January 29, 1973, an Instruction, called Immensae Caritatis, was issued by the Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship that authorized the introduction of Extraordinary Ministers of the Eucharist. Space doesnt allow all the details, but the propaganda in the 1970s that was used to sell Communion in the hand to a trusting, vulnerable people was a campaign of calculated half-truths that didnt tell the whole story. But after all this, Memoriale Domini then added a surprising disclaimer, leaving an avenue open to those bishops currently in disobedience over this issue. Though the entire essay will not be treated here, for the purpose of the subject at hand, it is necessary to point out the central aspect of it: the old paganism had deep respect for tradition, and the new post-Christian paganism has a revolutionary contempt for tradition.
